Quote from: Dusty11 on May 06, 2017, 12:24:52 AM

Quote from: kingorbust on May 05, 2017, 01:00:28 PM

Quote from: cryptocratic on May 05, 2017, 12:03:06 PM

Tell me someone why it is so undervalued ?

via has long history as a coin...it somehow stalled, was getting nowhere with old devs... Romano took over I think 2 or so months ago, he started coding, coding,coding like a madman and is making it success now. Market and investors agree on it, you can see on charts when it started to rise... only good thingd ahead.

It is still undervalued, despite the rise, because many many dont know that via has a new dev etc.

Anywhere to read the full history?
Was Romano ever in it previously? What happened to the original devs?
I just remember buying the ICO and dumping it for a nice profit.

Full history is probably pieced together by going through the entire previous ANN thread (link on the front of this new one).

Romano wasn't involved in VIA at the start but I believe linked to the coin a few months prior to officially being announced the new dev (he can chime in on that one if he wants).

From what I know the original dev just decided to leave for bigger better things with another project (maybe LTC?) again Romano can probably chime in on that one for us.

At this point in the game it's basically like a new coin with the old name. Romano mentioned a big reason he just picked up with VIA vs. starting his own coin was due to poloniex listing it -- which has proven to be very valuable. There are tons of big projects out there right now that are still fighting to be listed on polo. Not sure why they are so stringent, but they sure don't add coins often.