Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 10:42:49 AM

BU leads to bigger blockchain which leads to blockchain too be to be decentralised, which leads to centralisation

BU opens the road to a DOS attack vector with their bare block size increase. Additionally, (as was already seen) they also open up a lot of exploits in their bad code.

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 10:42:49 AM

Segwit leads to LN which leads to transactions handled off chain which leads bankers rejoicing and to centralised control of bitcoin

This is bullshit. LN does not need Segwit and LN will happen regardless of whether you want it or not, or whether Segwit is adopted or not. LN needs a malleability fix, and SW is just one of the ways of doing that. LN does in no way create centralized control of Bitcoin nor does it lead to bankers "rejoicing". Looks like someone didn't even read the ELI5.

Quote from: Grillo on May 06, 2017, 10:06:01 AM

good, I have some USDT so you better be right.

Just don't tell me that you're holding USDT on the shady exchange called Poloniex. Roll Eyes

Just be a bit more patient (Finex wise).