Quote from: ImHash on May 08, 2017, 04:57:31 AM

Quote from: johnscoin on May 07, 2017, 01:32:30 AM

Quote from: ImHash on May 06, 2017, 11:41:56 AM

Anyone having problem with the current Core devs should go and and start their own saints of development team with their own brand and coin.
Actually we pretty much are happy to stick with the devil that we know rather the devil that we don't know.

Just let your blockstream go and and start their own brand and coin.

I see now what you did there, it is really below you to use an alt for this, blockstream has it's own brand and coin and it's called BTC.
Why would they fork without the majority consensus? it's the other hostile parties with a few thousands ASICs trying to either take us hostage or perform a hard fork.

Using typos as an embarrassing method is the resort of likes of BU shills, I don't expect anything else.
But hey lets stall a bit longer to dump more LTC with higher prices.
I don't know if they ASICboosted the f**k out of LTC or not, I mean this was BTC and they did it now they want the throne? yeah you wish.

Bitcoin doesn't belong to Blockstream, ok bud?

litecoin is a distraction, not the issue. asicboost is a distraction, not the issue (JIhan Wu already tweeted he would accept code that kills asicboost).

The only thing that's mattered for the last 2 years is bitcoin getting a capacity increase, and clearly 95% support for segwit SF will not happen. Are you going to sit here and keep repeating "segwit" like a parrot?

...Or can you have enough sense to back some other proposals besides Blockstreams? Like Extension Blocks, 2mb+segwit HF, Bitcoin Classic, etc?