Quote from: gmaxwell on May 09, 2017, 08:24:25 PM

Quote from: gadman2 on May 09, 2017, 06:59:40 AM

I count about 11.

Honestly though, I don't care either way. I just want to stir the pot also.

Wow, repeating proven fraudulent claims from the BU folks, good for you.

Those ticks are spider restarts, a data artifact. There has never been an exploited node crasher for the Bitcoin project (and AFAIR there has only been one potential one, which we fixed before it was exploited-- The BIP37 integer divide by zero bug)

gmaxwell uses a bug found on TESTNET.. as a fake way to suggest that classic doesnt work..

UM. testnet is suppose to break. thats the point of it.. throw every attack vector at it..
by trying to presume that testnet should have rules is like saying a cat litter box should only contain diamonds and the cat is not allowed to defecate in it.

so gmaxwell.. never says he cant recall a bug that causes an error in core?
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9997
... wait..is this gmaxwell himself having an error with his own client!!!!!!!