Quote from: Lauda on May 09, 2017, 09:29:39 PM

Blah, blah, blah

Brain damage

Blah, blah, blah

Anyone who supports Bitcoin Unlimited at this point is a shill or an outright idiot. Pick the one which better describes yourself.

There comes your problem: you consider people idiots. Idiots that are going to be convinced that BU is a bad idea and embrace SegWit just because BU nodes are attacked. This community is stronger and smarter than you think. Is the number of BU nodes droping after the attacks? No, a few days after a patch is released the number is recovered. Is the number of Segwit signaling nodes increasing after each attack? Neither, it has been stagnant for months. What is the majority of people doing? Sticking with v12, because they know BU is constantly attacked, because they don't want SegWit, because they consider the poisonous pill of v14.1 a bad joke. People is smart. Segwit is not going to happen even if UASF is released by Core. They will have to hard fork Bitcoin in minority of nodes and miners if they want to see SegWit activated.

Quote from: -ck on May 09, 2017, 09:30:34 PM

Yes and when I have a bug that I introduced I call it what it is - my own bug. If I introduce an exploitable flaw in my code it is still my fault.

When an innocent is shot by a gun in real life we blame the shooter, not the innocent because he was not wearing a kevlar jacket. Unless you have "alternative ethics", of course

Besides, I think you are wrong when you consider that a good code is the one that does not glitch when attaked. First, it can simply mean that the other implementation have the economic power to hire developers to actively find new exploits.

Secondly, a good code is not the bug-free one. A good code is the one that is useful for people. If some people adopt BU is because they think is more useful for the network, and if the majority rejects to update from v12 to v14 is because they think Segwit is the biggest threat Bitcoin is facing at the moment