Quote from: Sithara007 on May 08, 2017, 04:04:46 PM

No surprise there. Most of these migrant lovers are ultra-rich moonbats, living in posh gated societies immune from the rapefugee terror. For them, the migrants are just another source of cheap labor.

Yeah, they're not going to be the people that are going to put the money and such where their mouth is. If they really wanted too, all these globalists scum could go ahead and pay the rent and such that the government would have to be paying for all these refugees instead of forcing the people to pay for it. This is also true in the US, where the main people who want to take in these people aren't going to be the ones that want to bankroll the budget behind them or even take them in.

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 10, 2017, 01:57:52 AM

Quote from: saddampbuh on May 09, 2017, 05:00:03 AM

i am well used to these hypocrites, i'm originally from hampstead london which is where the term champagne socialist originated, cheapest house is a couple of million and not a dark face in sight except maybe a plastic surgeon or two from the subcontinent but you wouldn't know it from the way the residents all vote labour or liberal democrat and wrote in their local newspaper about how the council should take in syrian refugees (it did, and none were sent to hampstead, all were dumped on the poor areas of camden)

I have an idea. Every single council must vote on whether they should accept these Muslims or not. The refugees must be sent only to those councils, which vote in favor of the idea. Let these liberals get an idea of the immigrant crime wave.

Though, wouldn't this people just be able to move out of the city they originally came to if they were already in France? Though I guess they'd only be getting benefits from the city if they LIVED in that city. Tough thing to work out