Quote from: DLGHT on May 11, 2017, 07:45:14 PM

Quote from: pallas on May 11, 2017, 03:08:59 PM

Quote from: btcma on May 11, 2017, 02:11:47 PM

Quote from: pallas on May 11, 2017, 11:53:47 AM

Quote from: ZeDRoYMaN on May 11, 2017, 11:18:28 AM

Quote from: pallas on May 11, 2017, 10:15:30 AM

Quote from: DLGHT on May 10, 2017, 05:35:40 PM

Thank you for your reply.
So what can we expect?

The reason I talked about wooing the chinese to nova is because btc38 is "closed" since deposits cannot be made.

We are aiming to have btc38 xcn wallet re-enabled.

Maybe somebody will be interesting watch answer BTC38 (today):
service staff 小思: Hello, the current XCN wallet on March 23 released a new version, but in the new version, all previous users of the recharge / withdrawal records are not unknown, so there is a faulty wallet, is not normal use, There is an official, if there is any problem that may lead to the loss of all users on the platform XCN, or platform for greater losses, so before they can not be completely repaired, can only wait for the official to fix it!

There we go again.
I've offered them the solution long ago, they just don't listen or understand.
And they don't talk to me in order to find a solution.
Maybe some chinese speaking guy should explain to them, again, that they should use the full blockchain snapshot and how to use it.

BTC38 believes that it is not normal for a new wallet to download a snapshot to identify the old transaction record. Can the wallet be automatically downloaded from the block file and then displayed on the old transaction record?

That would defeat the purpose of the mini blockchain technology, which is one of the distinctive features of the coin.
There is nothing wrong with using a blockchain snapshot: if the wallet correctly gets the new blocks from the network, you know that the snapshot was legitimate.

Which is why BTER38 may be up to something not nice. Since the coin must maintain its vision, then maybe we should go ahead without BTER38. It's either the coins on BTER38 then become lost forever, or they comply, or their users move to more prominent markets. Right now, the volume on BTER38 alone is so much that they could just be XCN. But it is a closed "market". For the coin to move forward the majority of volume must move from BTER38. Moreover analysis shows that there are very many dormant coins (possibly in Polo Wallets). The owners of this coin will be able to withdraw (at least) to trade on Nova and bx. This in turn will encourage Polo to re-list the coin. No one wants to trade a strictly "china" coin; I say that without offence.

it is btc38, not bter38. bter is another exchange, also chinese
xcn volumes on btc38, at least in the last 1 and a half year was always 10 times higher than poloniex volumes.
btc38 was the primary market for xcn, followed by poloniex (1/10 of btc38) and bter (1/10 of poloniex).
it is logical that 2/3 of xcn coins are on btc38, was the most liquid market for xcn.
polo has problems now, they raised response for tickets from 48 to 72 hours, they are full
when things will calm there i am sure they will fix xcn wallet.