Quote from: AhmedAshraf on May 12, 2017, 11:08:12 PM

Quote from: coralreefer on May 12, 2017, 10:55:56 PM

Quote from: AhmedAshraf on May 12, 2017, 10:53:52 PM

Check his post history re: Qora.

I'm not sure why you are attacking someone who is offering to help. You can simply decline his offer, or come up with a better solution.

Sorry if I came off as aggressive, but I believe his handling of funds a couple of years ago in Qora were suspicious to say the least.

That aside, I think the best way to go forward with the foundation idea is if we can set up a 2-3 multi-sig wallet with EK, an escrow and two other trusted members and have all fund releases approved by community voting.

What do you think?

i mentioned something similar a few pages ago .

best option would be 5 people with a 3 of 5 multi sig key(or 4 of 6), this is 60% required consensus on spending decisions and doesn't restrict access to funds if 2 of those people suddenly go offline and don't appear for months or years, which if someone isn't online and goes offline , the funds can then also be moved and someone else voted to the foundation .

Set up the voting /nomination process now , set up voting like we have done previously for all holders weighted votes to who they want to be part of the foundation and we could have a foundation with 4-6 members in it within a week or 2, all able to work on different fields and areas that require work to be done . if the right people are voted in a lot of the things we need made will be of little cost.

they can also work together to formulate a consistent clear development/roadmap plan to work towards .