Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
by
HR
on 18/05/2017, 11:27:10 UTC
I will appreciate your analyses, regardless its positive or negative if its objective analyses. But you sound upset and I get the feeling its getting personal for you, and if thats the case, I won't be able to trust your objectivity. Plus you are contradicting yourself. First your price estimate is ridiculously high and then you give it worse odds than Las Vegas casino. I didn't like your .001 prediction or arguments you gave to back it up, and I don't like your negative analyses either. Both of them are biased, based on emotion not on logic.  

Agreed, I tried bringing it up again but his backup for it was still 'anything can happen' and then gave an article to another coin rising 1000% (We'd need to hit 1000 SAT and THEN rise 1000% to get to 0.001 by the way and he had no reason to say why we'd follow suit).  Your 'analysis' isn't backed up by anything real and always seems to sway wildly to the extremes (here and in other threads) and that's why people don't take kindly to your aggressive turn of face, which to your own admission comes right after the DGB devs turned down a deal you offer them Huh Huh .  Likewise I would hope the DGB devs can keep these matters private in the future.  For the first time since the initial rise from 20 SAT I'm getting concerned, only mildly but I thought I'd add my 2 cents to the matter.

In the meantime I'm seeing lots of people on twitter trying to make a case for DGB on other exchanges, keep it up guys and keep up the positive image of DGB that you all worked hard to achieve.  

I've reposted below, for the 3rd time, the tongue-in-cheek, have a little fun reference to the OFFICIAL 1000:1 DGB:BTC ratio, with an explanation regarding possibilities based on FACTS that are seen not only in the representative example posted, but in the dozens of cases where a 1000% short term pump has occurred (if you'd done your math, you'd have realized that to get to .001, or the 1000:1 ratio, it was exactly 1000% more or less from where we were at the time . . . ironically).

With your insistence over and over again for an answer that's already been given twice before now, it looks like you are bent on getting something else that you'd prefer to hear, which suggests that the emotion and lack of objectivity is coming from you.


Enough miners for you to stick to 0.001 by July?  Even now I still find this quite the claim.

I already answered you here:



Regarding .001 BTC by the first week of July:

1) This is crypto, and anything can happen. Witness XBC just a couple of months ago: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lokisullivan/bitcoin-plus-gains-over-1000-in-24-hours


http://i.imgur.com/w3JGWum.jpg

Anything can happen.

2) Seasonality in crypto is strong into July (but that could extend this year given current bullishness).

3) .001 = the 1000:1 DGB:BTC ratio

4) Just having fun with a not completely impossible eventuality.  Wink


P.S. How many more examples like XBC can you find? Dozens? It's not that far fetched.


And if you'd like to get some more insight into my objectivity, please read my other posts in this thread too.