Quote from: atcsecure on May 19, 2017, 06:18:54 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on May 19, 2017, 04:19:46 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on May 19, 2017, 04:01:12 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on May 19, 2017, 11:20:09 AM

XC is missing out on a alt coin bullrun like nothing we have ever seen before.

By dragging feet here you are missing out on millions in return.

Get some decent developers cracking on this and get it in a position to rival other GOOD anon coins.

Let's also think about getting it on an exchange with some volume.

I am still totally amazed they allowed it getting delisted from bittrex.

I am shocked how this bull run has not inspired all hands on deck for XC and block these should be having teams working on them by now, be on better exchanges and be the discussion of BCT.

I think a rebrand for XC could be useful too.

I would like to see a technical comparison chart of this compared to dash, and other well known anon coins.

All I can do is provided the tech, everything else like the exchange listings and what not are outside of my hands/control.

Not much has been done w/ the XC Mixer since it was developed, it needs an update to prevent DDOS but XC's mixer is more advanced than dash as it uses multi-nodes to mix instead of 1. As such, the transaction can become huge, so XC forked back in august to support large mixed blocks but no additional work has been done on mixing since

Ok thanks for coming to the thread.

What does this mean though?
Does the mixer need work to become effective and free from DDOS attacks?

- a few weeks of coding to address the issues via a node/collateral system

Quote

Where in your opinion does XC stand in the anon ranks. I mean how could it fair against other leading mixing based and different solutions to anon projects like zcash zcoin xmr and dash.

blows dash out of the water since dash can be easily broken, the original XC thread has a visual map showing just how "mixed" the anon is.. basically dash is a 2 person coinjoin, while XC is a 3+ person coinjoin

Quote

Is anon not the main funiton of xc now and is it now shifting focus to other features?

its not a main function, and it hasn't been a priority either since the initial development

Quote

I guess I'm saying does the mixer need work to be worth of promoting it as a competition to these other projects and if not is there in the future plans to upgrade the mixer or move to another anon solution?

I'm open to discussion on this topic

Quote

I would help promote this coin if i was sure this is something that is going to be taken seriously and kept alive on this board so we can build a community around it again.

It is going to be taken very seriously and kept alive.. I'm actively looking to rebuild the community and showcase some of this tech and keep developing new tech.

Quote

I know block has to be the main focus and I am all for focusing on that until it is up there with the MC projects it deserves to be. I can not wait for a dex like blocknet.

Both projects are my main focus currently

Quote

However I hope after that XC will be getting a revamp too?

Yes the xc wallet will be updated to be inline w/ the latest btc code for the DX

Thanks for those answers they are very promising actually.

I think we should evaluate if it will take- a few weeks of coding to address the issues via a node/collateral system
If then after this it would be superior to using zcash or other methods of anon.

I guess it boils down to work vs rewards of improving XC current version of mixing or switching out for a new variation.

I would say with evidence of XC being worked on again it will not be hard to bring forth a community around it once again.

Just keeping this thread active will snag new members all the time and once XC really is match for some other big anons ie the mixer is fixed or we move to another variation of anon then we can start comparing on the main alt board for even more interest.