Quote from: mackenzied on May 19, 2017, 03:11:40 PM

You make me laugh when I read everything here, the action of a despicable man, it is you. A scamer trying to denounce their campaign. Unbelievable, you are a villain, you pretend to be kind and condemn others while you are always looking for way to cheat others. I think you are not worthy to continue here and denounce anyone else.
Shabby!

Useless ad hominem. It is completely irrelevant who made this argument/thread and it does not affect its validity in any way.

Quote from: neochiny on May 19, 2017, 05:33:21 PM

Anyway, does jamal manage the other bounties as well or just the signature campaign?
Cause if it's just the sig campaign then it's 100k for the sigs and the remaining 60k goes to the rest.

How did you come up with those numbers? The thread certainly does not say that it needs to be cut off at 100k, it says quite the opposite.]

Here's the PM(s) that they've sent me. I had to explain what negative ratings were and they just completely dismissed the accusation without even spending a minute trying to explain why. Roll Eyes

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 02:07:57 PM

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 02:06:22 PM

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 02:05:36 PM

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 01:54:26 PM

Quote from: TaaS on May 18, 2017, 01:51:23 PM

Not sure what that is, why it exists and what it affects. We are not using bitcointalk as our primary source of information.

That's an example of several negative ratings. Don't worry, people can spread the word outside of Bitcointalk considering that your information is public.

And what is the ground for negative rating?

Read the thread.

But you do realize these accusation are false and misleading?