Quote from: shinratensei_ on May 20, 2017, 11:28:57 PM

I just think if UASF will be splitting the chain of bitcoin like what will be done by Bitcoin Unlimited.

it will have forced the chain.

I don't like that.
UASF = Bad way.

I'll never be supporting this way. Angry

Even if UASF will create altcoin then be it. I am tired of constant complains and doing nothing, people just jump here , on youtube and talk use:
-LTC
-ETH
-another favorite alt
So if I will have to use clean fast chain with many fixes LN and malleability fix then be it altcoin fork BTC UASF no more BS about miners in charge market will decide which chain is better with segwit or without segwit. If BTC have to be overtaken by alt then be it BTC () UASF than any altcoin.
I am tired of that constant debate where to go and no solution for 2 years if that have to be done by alt UASF then be it.
I will use BTC as store of value and UASF to play casinos, pay for stuff. Same time let original BTC be original BTC.