Quote from: franky1 on May 23, 2017, 03:57:14 PM

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on May 23, 2017, 03:38:57 PM

Facts:

Bitcoin running under datacenters (ultimate goal of blockstreamist) = network centralized at layer 0(core).
cludgy lite/prunned/no witness stripped running = network centralized at layer 1
LN hubs set up using core DNS seed preferences = network centralized at layer 2

FTFY

by the way the non blockstream affiliated implementations are not calling for gigabytes by midnight..
thats just your FUD to get people to blindly walk in the middle of the core road
then get 1dimensional dinofelis and his sheep to stupidly hypnotise more sheep to running prunned/no witness nodes is good
that running full nodes is meaningless..

go on tell the community,.. who really has been harping on that prunned no witness cludgy software is good.. oh its blockstream

last things... check dcg.co and look for bloq (aka gavin)
yep gavin and hearne are just the drama puppets of the same blockstream/silbert plan for steering towards the bankers hyperledger highway via the blockstream roadmap

You didn't fix shit.

Core's first priority has been to keep the blocksize as conservative as possible because they care about the fact that people should be able to run their own nodes, unlike CIA agents Gavin Andressen and company.

Anything that breaks this principle goes against the network decentralization at the very layer 0.

Your posts continue being stupid nonsense with mixed half truths.

About this Barry Shillbert agreement, the only reason Jihad wants a HF for segwit is to keep his covert ASICBOOST scam going on, and also wants to kick Core from developing this and conveniently hired RSK devs which got caught by Core devs trying to put covert ASICBOOST friendly crap on the code. What a fucking loser.