Quote from: superskillz on May 27, 2017, 04:45:23 PM

Quote from: andrew2k on May 27, 2017, 04:42:07 PM

Quote from: SigmaDev on May 27, 2017, 04:27:27 PM

Quote from: andrew2k on May 27, 2017, 04:24:01 PM

Well, first of all the slack link doesn't work. Second, should we really focus onto the idea of replacing all the other coins? I believe that an amazing idea will prevail over time nonetheless, under one form or another. There's no real need to be aggressive, especially right now in the beginning. Why not give it a name such as JunoMoneta, or simply Moneta (check out the etymology of the word "money").

The logo should be something simple but powerful.

Hey, i have already suggested moneta in a pm with fl0w earlier and it is already taken on coinmarketcap,etc and right now with the whole "replacing other coins" is a clear end of the roadmap and not in the initial design of the coin, it is something that we see as an end goal

Then maybe Unique Moneta, or Juno Moneta, they could still work, especially since the coin Moneta is doing so bad (just checked it out on coinmarketcap).

Just a thought, but this is the difficulty with decentralizing all decision making.

As much as you want to decentralized the tool itself, the product needs a singular vision. Name, brand, differentiation is usually best built and held consistent by a designated person.

if i would have gooten an license to run an euro investment bank i would have done it and never created a new cryptocurrency but u need to be gay jewish or intermarried with the established banker caste
besides the current deregulation wave of the financial system is basically a result of that development, i think in the end people might cease to work so happily for money as they did in the past but well we will see.
regards