Quote from: kano on June 15, 2017, 05:52:23 PM

Quote from: icon73 on June 15, 2017, 03:13:46 PM

Quote from: kano on May 29, 2017, 11:09:09 AM

P.S. I never said your silly pool was "charging huge fees" - but I ignored your last post for lying that I said something that I never did.
For this month, assuming luck is as expected, your pool is charging a ~9% expected fee ... and saying your pool is always having bad luck simply says people shouldn't mine there, it doesn't excuse your pool currently charging that ~9% expected fee.

Kano, Now Bitcoin.com is paying 120% PPS. Where does that put us with the effective fees of the pool?

Well my pool's average block size this month so far is 123%
So that would be taking that 3% out of 123% as fees

Edit: though since you seem to keep pushing this point, I'll add that so far this month luck has also been 109% on my pool ... so that's averaging 133.9% PPS so far on my pool Cheesy

(last month was 124.1% and the previous month was 162.33%)
https://kano.is/index.php?k=blocks

You are right, I enjoy pushing the point. I sincerely hope you know that I do it in good fun, and not to troll you or pick a fight. That isn't my intention. I would love to get a 162.33% effective payout, all I need now is to find a pool that signals BU and pays that rate. I don't suppose you would signal BU or another non-segwit large block? I know based on your other messages you seem to not be a segwit fan.