Quote from: Pyrojason on June 01, 2017, 03:24:03 AM

Quote from: Lucko on May 31, 2017, 09:32:45 AM

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 18, 2016, 09:06:09 PM

The bulk of the remaining offline wallet funds are funds held and currently untouchable in the offline wallets from the withholding attack over a year ago which is awaiting legal confirmation before I can distribute it to affected miners from that time period.

Any news on that one... It is now over 2 years...

Interesting. Any idea which miners were affected?

The one they were mining at that time... And since this is taking so long problem is that a wallet from that time was compromised... I think it is about 230 BTC in total(not just me all the miners)... But it is so far back that I forgot... But it is somewhere in this thread...

EDIT: When looking for a number I found this. And it is BS...

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 08, 2017, 03:58:19 AM

Block Withholding Attack

A potential disposition of funds associated with the admitted June 2014 block withholding attack was also researched extensively by counsel. The initial resolution was to distribute the funds to the shelved shares during the time period associated with miners who would have potentially been affected by the withholding attack. This was investigated, and the CPPSRB share log for that time period was analyzed extensively. It was concluded that the pools reward system had already earned enough as a result of short term luck to cover the vast majority of shelved shares that would have potentially been affected by the attack. Further analysis showed that the majority of the addresses from that time period actually had no shelved shares that would have otherwise been paid had the attack not happened. Any that did still have any shelved share deficit that could be linked to the attack were either no longer active on the pool or blockchain since that time and/or, if awarded a calculated potential deficit, would be under the 2 TBC low-balance donation cut off balance after such an award was made. Only a very small number of miners did not fit into these categories as it appears that miner turnover was quite high since then.

General morals coincided with the advice of counsel in this case. It would not be right to utilize a distribution method that disproportionately benefited the pool itself (in the form of hundreds of low-balance donations) and instead actual miners should be awarded.

The distribution of these funds went as follows, as approved by legal counsel:
Miners from the time period that were no longer active at Eligius nor had a balance but had a potential reward deficit of more than 2 TBC (0.00131072 BTC) had those shelved CPPSRB shares awarded.
Miners from the time period that were either still active at Eligius and/or had an outstanding balance such that awarding their shelved shares from the time period would bring their balance to 2 TBC (0.00131072 BTC) had those shelved CPPSRB shares awarded.
The above only helped less than 0.5% of miners in the final Eligius-Ra payout and left over 98% of the block withholding attack related funds unrewarded.
The remaining funds were awarded to shares starting at the top of the CPPSRB share log. This had the effect of rewarding a large number of shelved shares of miners who have been active at Eligius over the past half-year or more.

The end result was that these funds were awarded to Eligius miners in a fashion where no miner had an unfair advantage, and, perhaps most importantly, 100% of the funds went to Eligius miners.

I was mining at that time... and have less then 90% of shares rewarded but didn't receive nothing... And that would be about 0,34BTC. And the idea to give this to current users. No! Users from that time were effected not users that were mining 2,5 years later... So you should give it to users from Juny 2014 back since that would happened in a normal process that wouldn't take 2,5 years... And we were screaming long before June 2014 that this was happening...