Quote from: sdotdot on May 31, 2017, 04:49:03 PM

Quote from: abvhiael on May 31, 2017, 01:51:10 PM

Quote from: sdotdot on May 28, 2017, 11:57:41 AM

If the gaycoin dev is so honest, why pump the coin exactly on 23 April?

When is a developer buying up against the sell wall something dishonest?

When he's asking 445btc instead of a theoretical 40btc for a coin with 0.25466027 BTC total buy orders? When he's saying that he had huge plans for the coin after not doing shit for 3 years? This is an obvious attempt to turn shit into gold, but he only managed to alienate poswallet's staff into delisting all shitcoins. Good job, fags!

.

again, its not the value per se as the actual incident itself, the casual disregard to security and other people fundss that is the biggest concern. yes, presently the assumable value of the coins in the wallet held by poswallet represents an incredible sized loss, but that size of loss is treated as any other stock fraud investigation. even 40BTC return against that loss would be a start for Mr. Lawin, but presently, he's sitting with a loss-value that equals what it does, as simple as that, regardless of market depth.

if you review the threads the GAYcoin developer presented upon launch, he was clear that he had future plans, but was met even then with prejudice and bigotry in the same vein as you present here. he abandoned trying to market the project to the cryptocurrency community, but maintained developing it, making sure it had market representation, purchasing domain names and making plans to rebuild the project for awhile. you may not understand the need for a cryptocurrency with a social consciousness, but with your derogatory remarks, i cant see how explaining it to you would do any good. you seem hyper-focused on the nature of the currency and not the act of fraud. you are almost CHEERING for the act itself, presented through your enmity.

its rather incredulous to state that poswallets actions to delist the majority of altcoins they supported can be traced to the fact they got caught with their hands in the cookie jar performing very unconventional and likely criminal actions behind the scenes. forensically, theres little other explanation other than the funds that have gone missing from Mr. Lawin;s wallet (and others who have complained regarding suddenly missing funds from the exchange, in various other currencies) other than it was done from within inside the exchange itself.

i understand you may have a bias against the LGBT community, for whatever reason, and are letting that completely colour your reaction, but this is not the sort of forum in which such language of discrimination is appreciated as a general rule. go troll the politics and society section with your neanderthalic logic if you need to vent in that sort of way, but try to keep your comments civil here, if you dont mind. ANYONE'S SEXUAL ORIENTATION has ZERO RELEVANCE to this conversation. for what its worth, im what my wife calls "meat and potatoes straight", but my orientation has nothing to do with why i have come to work with the GAYmoney developer, and isnt something that has ever come up in conversation between myself and him. but i admit to being a liberal minded individual, who as a half-breed Indian faced prejudice of my own growing up, so i appreciate any project that battles racism or sexism or any -ism that seeks to set one individual above another by virtue of some condition. im a hyper-equalist, and thats why im even wasting my time replying to you in the first place...

you have your valid counter-points to the situation, but remain focusing on the currency's social stance rather than looking at the situation from a broader perspective. the politics of the currency have absolutely nothing to do with the nature of the situation at hand. what if this had been a 2.4 mln unit wallet of HONEY, or BLK, or MUE, or any OTHER currency? that being said, i do welcome your contribution to this discussion, BUT....

if you cannot keep your conversation civil and not resort to denigrating homophobic slurs in order to make yourself feel special, you can also choose not to reply to this thread altogether and not make a bigger tool out of yourself than you already have with your comments. i support the freedom of discourse, and this discussion, which is truly about the perils of anonymous centralized exchanges and the safety of your deposited assets in such an ecosystem, id be more than willing to continue discussing this with you, but if you feel your only contribution is to speak in slanderous tones then theres absolutely no reason to continue communicating with you.

this is not about "turning shit into gold" this is about ensuring that exchange operators become accountable for their responsibilities with other peoples assets. GAYmoney is moving forward with our rebranding regardless of this situation, and we will monitor the wallet to catch any future movement of funds from that account, but presently musts consider the funds burned without present compensation. the bigger picture will involve responding to North Carolina's FinSEC offices and the representatives of that states SecState regarding the situation, and MAYBE it will lead, alongside other issues, to spur proper legislation be enacted, that proper regulations be enforced, that there be clear cut registration and rules for cryptocurrency exchanges.