It's actually an example of what an incoherent random mess looks like and of how to impose the most adverse of couplings at the wrong place in the design/development cycle, just so you've got "something to sell".
I suppose we could test it out though. Try painting an online Picasso by letting everyone vote on where the next pixel goes. Could be interesting. At least it would be democratic !

That's nice.

The point is Dash's future emission and branding are no more fixed than Darkcoin's were. That is to say, not at all.
Darkcoin's emission was changed on Evan's whim.
Then Darkcoin's brand was changed on Evan's whim.
No Masternode voting was involved. No wonder you have to fling poo at Decred's scrupulously ethical blockchain democracy.
