Quote from: Miz4r on June 07, 2017, 02:30:41 PM

Quote from: Hyena on June 06, 2017, 07:14:27 AM

Quote from: Dafar on June 05, 2017, 08:50:10 PM

Lol... says the pathetic blocknet shill advertising blocknet all over bitcointalk and desperately trying to undermine bitcoin.

Do you know bitcoin is the most secure, liquid and immutable crypto out there? Do you know bitcoin is here for good while shitcoins will come and go? Tech doesn't mean jack shit when bitcoin has the best developers and can adapt the tech of any shitcoin using sidechains and smartcontracts

best developers, don't make me laugh Grin

those "best" developers are unable to even increase the block size limit
they have crippled Bitcoin more than they have done any good
SegWit is a clusterfuck of unnecessary code written in the name of a soft fork and now they want to hard fork Bitcoin with UASF in order to enforce their soft fork. Those guys are absolute morons and hypocrites

Bullshit, Core isn't even behind BIP148 so you might want to check up on your facts. Segwit is a genius piece of code and is being criticized by incompetent fools like you who can only parrot other fools who don't understand code either. Talking about morons and hypocrits. Roll Eyes

I think the point Hyena was making was about the ridiculousness of implementing segwit as a softfork to avoid a hardfork, but then needing a hardfork to activate UASF which is the only way it looks like being accepted by the network. When a hardfork would have been the proper way to go from the start.

Also I'd say the segwit 'bundle' of updates also includes malleability fix which is what enables offchain scaling like lightning network. To me at least it is very debateable that offchain scaling is the way to go.