Quote from: nightraven on June 10, 2017, 11:56:10 PM

Quote from: escapefrom3dom on June 10, 2017, 07:27:43 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on June 10, 2017, 06:57:36 PM

Quote from: escapefrom3dom on June 10, 2017, 06:08:10 PM

Quote from: eggdescrambler on June 10, 2017, 02:37:46 PM

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off. Anyway, why do it? Let's just have it on PASC. That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

Because miners PASA owners do not fully trust the 3rd party PASA market. Because of the lack of confidence that resulted in the amount of PASA supply in the market less than the maximum pasa. Pasa / miner owner hopes there is PASA market in gui wallet. Possibly over time of trust will arise and market pasa can be used optimally. While whitepaper V2 mentions the presence of pasa market in the wallet.