Yes it is not necessary and there is no reason for anyone to think I've sold my account. In fact, i'm a little tired of these silly argument by assertions.
But since I offered, the first address is signed with a message "jf-6-11-2017"
HGcmK97jOH6XtCOT0wIYKYxtXu7C7RdXZKu6WtnpjZWNNRHl1ic+VlmengWVAn3S9QRd8UYRKRXsaHISWMlLorY=
Yep, verified that.
It makes far more sense to me that negative trust from DT members would be limited to suspicious trade deals specifically, because anything else is subject to bias.
That's not to say that DT members shouldn't be
able to do this, but that it would be misleading for them to have a red tag next to their name for something that wasn't trade-related.
But since this is the forum we're on, you need to think yourself about how you could have avoided the rating.
Some of your threads are quite misleading about what you're talking about - for example, there was a thread claiming that Adam Back wanted $100 fees, when in fact he just suggesting that people would be
willing to pay that much but directly said he would prefer the fees to be much lower. You also started a thread claiming that Luke Jr wanted people to use fiat, when in fact he was pointing out how ridiculous the alternatives to Bitcoin are (the exact opposite).
It's clear that Lauda would have done this a very long time ago if it was
solely about your opinion rather than you acting in this misleading way.
There's nothing misleading at all about those threads, and they link directly to the source so you can see what Adam or Luke said. This is nothing compared to all the BS and lies coming from people like Greg (see the link earlier in this thread for proof).