Quote from: LitcoinCollector on June 15, 2017, 09:49:13 AM

Hey Crypto Hunter, talk all you want.

Hunter yeah right, great hunting skills > you didn't manage find a great ico that was open for a month.

You are totally untrustworthy for endorsing anon dev Footballcoin. Everybody knows this.

Now run along and find the next shit coin to endorse and signature spam, the ico will be over soon, and football coin devs will be gone too (with the money from people you lured into their ico).

Shhhh with the diversions. Stick to topic. I've told you to open your own scam threads about other coins. Bring proof or even corroborating evidence that makes some kind of logical sense and perhaps I can take you seriously.

This is a prime tactic of scam pumpers. They have to divert to other projects. Stick to the topic or make your own thread.

If you instantly invest in ico just because you see them in a sig with out doing your own DD then you have the issue nobody else.

So far I see no shred of evidence you have produced nor any corroborating circumstances. Except the devs are anon? who is satoshi again? who is jl777 ? do you have the linked in for every dev of every project out there?

Diversion nothing more.

Besides as I have told people like you before if you proved I was actually the devil himself that can not alter the factual observable events that I am highlighting here for anyone to see for themselves.

Your points are null and void with respect the topic here. Try another angle perhaps? Forget focusing on me and focus rather on the observable events that I am pointing out. Starting to get it now? that is the only way you could destroy my argument. Of course you know this and that is why you are not focusing on that but diverting.

Try again.

Everybody ?? I would not tarnish everyone with your flawed variant of logic.

Anyway I have nothing more to say on the subject there is nothing more to say. I have seen no attempt to refute the 3 points i made up topic. The comparisons to other ICOS running at that time and cfbs comments leave nothing more to add. Until i see a logical rebuttal of those points there is nothing more to argue about. The corroborating events logically suggest it was stealth like or that everyone here is literally crazy and deliberately invested in all the other icos around and didnt want iota until a few days after the ico was over. Then wanted to pay magnitudes more for the same thing and all voted on a poll they did not hear about the ico. Perhaps they are all crazy and iota holders are the only sane ones. Please be sensible nobody is that silly.

As i said it isn't the worst case of planned self enrichment but it is a pretty good one. I think they have over played it though most will not accept 2000x times an ico they somehow missed while not missing all the other well advertised icos.

We will see. If they pull it off good luck to them.

Now don't waste my time with your nonsensical illogical rebuttals which are obvious diversions with no bearing on the events that i highlight.

Come with new material or else remain silent since your football coin wittering on with no shred of evidence to back it up is nothing more than irritating in the respect you think that I would fall for it. Even if you pull up some evidence please do not clutter this thread with it make a cryptohunter has a scam in his sig thread. I will await you findings.