There was a lot of questioning about the "temporary" 1MB limit several years ago, but I don't know if this holds true today.
it doesn't hold true if you buy into Blockstream propaganda, I suppose.
Christ, this is boring. At least I mentioned the ViaBTC and F2Pool's polls, while you haven't mentioned any information whatsoever except for generic comments about "propaganda". I'm waiting for your response, I'm not anyone's enemy. Chill.
Bitcoin was always supposed to scale on chain with bigger blocks. Go read early satoshi writings, or my
letter to the miners. It's all there.
This looks like an argument of your own rather than a reference proving that the "community has been asking for big blocks for years".
It's not there, you've argued that people used to agree with a large block size a long time ago, which is true, but you've provided no recent evidence about "the community".
Or does the "community" only consist of people you like?
If you don't believe me, that's fine, but there's nothing else to explain.
There is. All you need to do is answer what I actually said instead of some hypothetical statement.
There was a lot of questioning about the "temporary" 1MB limit several years ago, but I don't know if this holds true today.
Can you show that it holds true today?