Quote from: Carlton Banks on June 16, 2017, 05:22:48 PM

What makes you think that allowing positive trust and/or high ranked members is going to produce useful information?

Sigh. Learn how the forum works.

Quote from: DooMAD on June 16, 2017, 05:54:26 PM

Thread is up. I doubt I'll be bothering to check everyone's reputation feedback, but I can probably divvy up the list by membership rank if that's important. Also, in the interest of balance, should we include things like 8MB if miners are still signalling that?

I don't think we should as those are not even being considered anymore, at least not at this time.

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on June 16, 2017, 06:02:38 PM

-snip-

Shills should not be allowed to vote anyways. Stop whining.

Quote from: mmortal03 on June 16, 2017, 10:13:38 PM

What's up with Bitmain being listed as finding BIP141 acceptable until July, when they're obviously not pointing their hash power at it?: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_support

Edit: Oh, look, there's a thread for that: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6hn2zj/why_did_bitmain_go_from_no_to_acc_until_july_for/

Maybe the statement as found in the OP is just a bluff. This means that BIP 148 is working.