Quote from: ruletheworld on June 17, 2017, 10:57:38 PM

Quote from: MoveCrypto on June 17, 2017, 05:18:10 PM

Quote from: ruletheworld on June 17, 2017, 03:49:04 PM

ICN has significantly underperformed ETH since its ICO though. You can check that here: https://icostats.com/vs-eth
The point is not that ICN hasn't done well, but when compared to the alternative for many people, which is just hold ETH instead, it has significantly underperformed.

The ICO prices for a lot of the assets on this site are way off.

I messaged the owner about it, and he said he is working on auditing/correcting the prices.

Some of them like DGD or ANS are listed at +100% or -50% what the actual ico prices were, based on BTC and ETH prices on date ico closed.

Iconomi (ICN)
https://medium.com/iconominet/iconomi-ico-token-share-calculation-finalised-9747e69d496d
10,682,516.42 USD equivalent raised for 87m ICN issued = $0.122787545 --> site has it listed as $0.13

converting to other currencies using the weighted average exchange rates from the blog post:
0.122787545 USD ÷ 605.893 USD/BTC = 0.000202655 BTC --> site has it listed as 0.00025445 BTC
0.122787545 USD ÷ 13.1603 USD/BTC = 0.009330148 ETH --> site has it listed as 0.0118 ETH

That doesn't change the overall trend, does it? I am long ICN btw, it's just that investors need to see the full picture, and not parrot that their favorite coin is going to the moon and blah blah.

Doesn't change that only wankers write about how well Dash price is doing in the Monero thread