Quote from: Gosh on June 18, 2017, 11:46:54 PM

Quote from: Mr.Ease on June 18, 2017, 10:19:32 PM

Quote from: Gosh on June 18, 2017, 06:56:24 PM

We need rules to be followed for the ICOs
the most aren't even publishing the contracts to be verified on etherscan
This is the future may become one of the main features requested by ICOs
we must decide rules and make serious forecasts
and kick out anyone not following the rules.
No contract visible = POSSIBLE SCAM
If they can change the maxcap in real time = POSSIBLE SCAM
ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE BASIC CONDITIONS SHOUD BE MARKED AS SPAM (they can later satisfy the conditions and list the project again and again until they learn how to introduce their job)
if we want a thriving platform we must be able to select projects and learn how to be more picky and more selective!
the result will be a platform where only serious projects are pushed
If you can't read the code of the contract, the project shouldn't enter WINGS platform AT ALL!

We must write a WINGS ETIQUETTE to follow in order to list on wings

Actually, screw all that... that would defeat the purpose of wings forecasting.

We need all types of icos. Even shit ones we can call shit so that wings platform is even more credible.

Certain icos will get great forecasts and that should be the sign that it is a legitimate project worth investing in.

Other, shit icos will get a terrible forecast telling investors it's a risky investment.

Good, bad, and ugly icos should all be accepted. The more accurate wings forecasting is, the greater value the platform will become.

is it legitimate in your opinion to publish a project with an invisible contract?
or...is it a restriction to ask to publish the contract?
without any guidelines it will be just more messy

Your right, that isn't legit.
Some guidelines may be a good idea when dealing with technical issues like that, especially when we are looking at icos receiving millions