Quote from: af_newbie on June 21, 2017, 01:52:38 PM

Quote from: Iranus on June 19, 2017, 04:33:57 PM

Quote from: af_newbie on June 19, 2017, 04:18:25 PM

Quote from: Qartada on June 19, 2017, 03:46:12 PM

Quote from: Snail2 on June 19, 2017, 02:02:47 PM

Quote from: craked5 on June 19, 2017, 11:59:56 AM

Lol the logic:

All Western countries are destroying entire ME countries, killing dozens of thousands of innocents civilians, few terrorists kill maybe 200 Europeans -> They are monsters shame on them kill all Muslims

A guy decides to kill 10 Muslims without any reason -> Yeah but the Muslims saw that coming those bastards

THE LOGIC

You see I doubt that those kids in Manchester or those tourists in London bombed or killed anyone. Also doubt that this guy in the van looked at his actions in a wider perspective. I guess his logic was that muslims who living between us can go rabid any time and kill our loved ones, so we should take preventive measures. Perhaps he kept watching the Walking Dead too long.
BTW sooner or later we'll have to kill them all otherwise they will kill us, while cooking their rice on fires made out of paintings of van Gogh and Rembrandt. The only good thing will be that they will clean out the multikulti leftist-liberal scum from Europe as well Wink

.

ISIS didn't exist until various countries decided to use the Middle East for their war games, killing thousands of innocent civilians. Given no other choice because they're being screwed over by the West, some people turn to extremism. What happens after that is that the violence starts escalating because each group starts condoning terrorist attacks from their side.

>Muslim person commits terrorist attack

"They're horrible terrorists!"

>Non-muslim person commits terrorist attack

"Serves those bloody [innocent] Muslims right!"

Some people's reasoning is seriously baffling.

Learn your Islamic history before you speak on the subject.

https://www.politicalislam.com/tears-of-jihad/

As someone correctly points out in the comments section of the article:

Quote

Hmm, 270 million killed by jihad (lets close our ears and pretend it had nothing to do with the political and ethno-cultural tensions in any of the regions) and still less than the amount killed by the Catholic church, the Soviets and many political leaders, OTHER than Muhammad. Yet, no one mentions those statistics. And what about all the non-Christians killed in the Christianizing missions of Europeans? Were those the Crusades redux? By the same logic, then the British and French empires Crusaders as felt the White Mans Burden in needing to modernize the ignorant Brown and Black men.

This website is a joke and a thinly-veiled Islamophobic rant (Christians were martyred, while other religionists were killed?). Good thing intellectuals and academics dont listen to this kind of hogwash. You all can live in your closed little world thinking that you are important or that anyone really pays attention to your stupidity.

Currently, dramatically Muslims are being killed by terrorism in the Middle East than Christians, because ISIS and other terrorist groups hate anyone which doesn't agree with their mindset.

Your victimisation complex and your support of terrorism from non-Muslims is insane. You have crazy confirmation biases and no self-awareness.

Are you sure? "Their mindset?"

ISIS is an Islamic State. They are the true Muslims. Please do not refer to them as a "mindset". They follow the Quran and the Hadiths.

Just because you developed your own version of Islam by skipping the troublesome Quran verses does not mean others have to.

They kill all non-believers. That includes those who oppose their Islamic State, it does not matter that the victims profess that they are 'Muslims'. If you are against a global Caliphate, you are the enemy. It does not matter what religion you think you follow.

Just because you developed your own version of Islam by skipping the peaceful Qur'an verses does not mean others have to.

As with the Bible (both religions are bullshit if you ask me), there are many direct contradictions in different sections of the Qur'an. Some argue for peace and some don't - the difference is that you're assuming that Muslims who look at one side of the Qur'an are "true" Muslims, while those who look at the other side of the Qur'an are not.

By cherry picking information in this way, you are supporting terrorists by implying that all other Muslims should join them, and therefore implying that all Christians should become terrorists too in opposition to this.

There are people on this thread literally calling for genocide ("we need to kill them all"), and that's not troubling for you?