Quote from: Amph on June 24, 2017, 02:41:08 PM

Quote from: Searing on June 22, 2017, 10:29:43 AM

Quote from: Amph on June 22, 2017, 07:28:33 AM

Quote from: ridery99 on June 21, 2017, 12:47:08 PM

Is the SegWit coming or what? Everyone says different things

probably yes, but it's tricky, because it's a combination of segwith which require 95% and 2mb hard fork, and from my understanding some miners don't like that the hard fork it's done after the activation in segwit2x...

then you have the UASF users that don't like miners, and don't like the fact that miners are agianst the second part of activation of segwit2x, the hard fork of 2mb, than the core team which is not pro all this

ah soap opera indded

Again bitcoin core could just block the hardfork yet correct?

This compromise will just remove the segregated witness roadblock.

I just can't see core rolling over on this and giving all this future power

On development to the miners. Cave from their view on decentralization and

If they believe themselves, still believe a hard fork is dangerous and impractical.

It will likely be another year of FUD, if they can't even agree to meet in person.

Imho. Damn well hope I'm dead wrong.

well no one can block anythiung here, because bitcoin is decentralized and based on con sensus, so if the majority want segwit2x this will happen regardless of everythign else

but then you have that if the exchange are not with segwit2x and remain with the old fork or want pure segwit, they will not listen the hard fork and therefore it's no different than having a new altcoin

the exchange now are on the fence it seems, it's not know what they are with it

So if enough people want seq wit 2 that part is on. But are there enough in bitcoin core
camp to block the 2mb hard fork? That is what I thought. Someone clarify? I'd bet bitcoin
core could dig up enough to stop 2mb hard fork. Details on how I'm wrong with how this works?