Quote from: jack0m on June 29, 2017, 11:41:17 AM

Quote from: SeanPiknick on June 29, 2017, 11:03:55 AM

Quote from: NTRY on June 29, 2017, 05:08:58 AM

Quote from: dz4505 on June 29, 2017, 04:24:08 AM

https://icotracker.net/project/ntry_platform

You might want to take a look at this. Your project is marked as Scam Alert.

Also why do you use gmail instead of email with your domain name? Looks very amateurish.

Thanks for your opinion,

Wow, no question asked, just marked as scam. I`ve contacted the writer and waiting for explanation.

Regarding the mail. We all have our mails with the domain name, I just prefer gmail, its the fastest way the people can reach me (+ I am using google docs of this address to calculate the bounties,...).

If anyone feels better they can write us on info@notary-platform.com

regards,
saso

Hello

I'm the founder of the Tracker and one of the Curators.

Your project has been flagged as an alert. SCAM projects are marked for example so https://icotracker.net/project/declouds

Next a few thoughts on why an Alert is set.

If you decide to appeal to the community for financial help in realizing your idea, the goodwill is so kind and open your faces in a broad sense. Give people irrefutable proof of your experience. Provide a technical proof of the concept. Justify your decision about such large bonuses for early birds... is not it easier to write 10% instead of 5? This is all a game of words often used by scammers. Show real development progress. During all this time, you wrote at least a couple of lines of code? So just show it on GitHub ) etc.

Do not misunderstand me. All these thoughts are based on a real 3-year experience of investing in ICO. I look at your website, which is made "on the knee" under the WordPress (on probation), and I catch déjà vu from the scamers for 3 years and I can not understand how the people who created this site can realize the notarial platform.

I hope I managed to convey the main idea.

Though I do appreciate your purpose "to make more informed investment decisions through the ICO and want to give the opportunity for all", I believe if you demand more transparency to others, then you should be as much transparent on your side. On your website I read "Who we are? We are distributed team of enthusiasts." That tells very little about yourself...
Who are the Curators? How many are there? What kind of experience and technical expertise can they show, in order to prove their ability to assess the validity of a project?
How can you ensure your judgement is free from any conflict of interest? Etc. Etc.

I know it may look like I'm playing the devil's advocate here, but I'd like to point out those considerations above are not specifically related to this Notary project, rather to your ICO Tracker in a broader sense.

I understand you, but I do not think so.

To me, as an investor does not need to be public, but I invest only in projects whose team is either open, or proved their experience. Through the Tracker, I simply broadcast my choice. And no more. If someone distrusts me... let him pass by. I do not take money from him or listed projects. The best proof of my competence is participation in the ICO and my portfolio indicators for the expired period. But when, or if, I decide to ask the community to help me with money for the realize some idea, I will open, or I will provide proof of my solvency.