Quote from: TrissMerigold on July 05, 2017, 04:04:24 AM

Quote from: AGD on July 04, 2017, 06:51:37 AM

Bitcoin has proven, that it is works fine, even through times of different attack modes (FUD, spam, patenting, +, XT, RV, CW etc). I don't think we have a pressure to raise the blocksize or to force the mass adaption. We don't need no SegWit to make Bitcoin great again, because it is already. Give this baby time to grow, folks.

yeah agree instead of segwitx2 maybe its time to fix goddamn fees or maybe transaction time , dont know if clearing blocks from segwit will make transaction faster tho , i heard also it will be splitted between bitcoin core and bitcoin unlimited , the hell is different between these two things ? i still didnt understand , they just make it harder for bitcoin user

The introduction of Schnorr signatures will make spam attacks a lot more expensive and this will reduce these spam attacks and also sort some of the problems with scaling. So this has two advantages < it takes less space and it makes spam attacks more expensive > I am saying more expensive, not impossible and these are just some of the advantages applicable to this argument. You can read a bit more about this here : https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/the-power-of-schnorr-the-signature-algorithm-to-increase-bitcoin-s-scale-and-privacy-1460642496/