Quote from: nofear900 on July 05, 2017, 08:47:55 AM

Of course i will blame the fk house.Bullshit rules like this one are bad for the game and they will scam many new players who come to place a bet.
Seems like u all don't have fkin idea what are the official rules by most of the bookmakers.But u know what,Nitrogen owners set those rules deliberately,knowing there will be new players,who come and doesnt give a shit about rules and just want to place a fkin bet.That's my case- i came to the site,YES without looking into bet rules, BUT i thought standart tennis rules on most betting houses are valid here too.

That's why im posting this thread here,to let know big players to not risk their money on this pathetic betting house!
If i've made that bet on Bet365 i would've won my BTC + 0.11 ,0.12 BTC up from Raonic match.

Guess i need to learn from my mistake the hard way - NEVER PLAY ON SMALL BULLSHIT SCUM SITES !

Peace

I see this as pretty ambiguous. I live in australia so i'm going to cite australian sportsbooks.

Ladbrokes says this:

Quote

In Match Betting, if one player withdraws or is disqualified after the first set has been completed, the player progressing to the next round or that is awarded the match by the umpire will be considered the winner. If the first set has not been completed, all Match Bets will be void.

This is basically what Nitrogensports is following. But sportsbet says the opposite:

Quote

all bets are void in the case of a match that involves a retirement or disqualification.

Bet365 seems to void bets as well.

It ultimately depends on the exact wording of the terms and conditions listed by the sportsbook you're playing at. In tennis this is a pretty common occurance, so i think that it's worth checking out next time their terms before actually betting.