Quote from: RATM69 on July 05, 2017, 11:36:52 AM

This looks like a very interesting and almost confusing project. But I like what I see in the white paper.

Thanks - I am glad you found this is the case. The theory behind the White Paper is absolutely critical to a) the point of doing an ICO in the first place and b) the whole centrifugal argument as to how/why the thing is decentralised (as opposed to just being a fake IPO). Lately, it has seemed with ICOs that none of the writers have ever been to University and/or have ever read a White Paper (not that you need Uni to understand a WP but you DO need to understand that its primarily a thesis that is supported by some practical solution/application). We tried to get away as much as possible from the marketing brochure bullshit and really distill meaningful use-case solutions and options here with a view to evolving tokens as a suigeneric asset in and of themselves (ie not just a share or partnership unit rip off). We will be evolving the WP constantly as the ICO gets underway, too. And it may not even be fully complete as a body of watertight theory until the practical implementation of the multi-ICO strategy gets going over the next 6 months or so. What it will always have is potential solutions and not just sales pitches however. Cause you can always go and watch another infomercial, after all. Hopefully more ICOs will take heed. Knowledge progression and moving the dial is fundamental and key and I have zero tolerance for what looks like branding pap.