Yes, Colombo. You have figured it out, I am a dishonest computer. Beep Boop.
You so smart, now go make another account and accuse someone else of being me.
(Which is really just me accusing me of being me though, but who isn't me, right?)
Your words are worthless, it's proven that you're like the thief that was caught stealing and was captured on camera, everyone already saw the replay, but you'd still lie your ass off like a good little sociopath.
Wow, look at that replay. Slow that down to half speed now.
That's a good look'n ass right there, if I could say so myself.
Hey, where did you get this video from? Is this my bathroom?
Did Chinese intelligence give this to you? You sick bastard.
Ahh, that attitude again, looks like you're still proud of your lying.
Let's make you famous for it.
Let's pick some AgentofCoin classic, there is just so much to choose from.
AgentofCoin's sociopathic gem #1 - flat out rewrite history then blame you for it.Here, we can see AgentofCoin is clearing stating the signing of HK Agreement is meaningless. He's cocky as shit about it too:
"First off, the fact that Jihan signed the HK Agreement doesn't mean anything of any value in relation to this current ASICBoost issue. So, I'll give you 0.5 points for your first fact. Half a point because Jihan signed it, but that doesn't prove anything at issue."
3 pages later, after all his bullshit were busted, he rewrites history:
My simple premise all along: "If Bitmain...do not think patching ASICboost is appropriate...why did they originally... sign the HK agreement...?"
So our little sociopath here just changed his story 180 degree after 3 pages.
Sociopathology has nothing to do with this.
Your quotes are blatantly taken out of the context of the conversation we had.
You have taken two parts separated by time and discussion, and claim it is revision.
In fact, they are saying the same thing, asked through two different ways, but since
you are stupid you do not understand that.
With majority of the question that I asked, you never give an appropriate response,
if I recall. Most of your answers (with your alt troll account Alex.BTC) were superficial
and required no thought, like a simpleton. Again, you perform the same feats of
arguments that are worthless and do not prove true things, but word play and
word games.
People who are smart know the difference here.
This isn't even the best part, the best part comes after:
You are missing my major point as usual
If you read what I wrote prior and weren't so superficial and stuck in your box
then you would understand my argument is based on a simple premise
You have never addressed this simple issue.
Yet I do not recall you ever addressing this or providing your theory as to this aspect.
You keep going around in circles without directly providing a possible puzzle piece to my simple premise.
So according to AgentofCoin, it's your fault for not addressing something he just made up.
Something that he stated was meaningless 3 pages ago, is now "his premises all along".
You fool, you never answered it in all the pages we discussed. I had to write out every
word plainly at the end again because you are incapable of understanding anything I was
saying. Its like feeding a baby. Now you again bringing it back up and again look
retarded since you still haven't answer it. You never answered any of my questions.
You continued to deflect everything, ignoring my main argument to only argue stupid
unimportant issues. This is another unimportant issue.
I had questions. You deflected my questions and didn't want to answer. You don't want
answers, you just want people to follow you and take your word. You think miners are
absolute. You seek full control and full obedience. That is not Bitcoin and you will learn
the hard way it seems.
I do not understand why you are picking a fight, unless it is out of pure ego.
And because he rewrote history, you're now "stuck in your box", "keep going around in circles", "You have never addressed this simple issue".
You think that's all? Nope, this completes the set:
You have changed your original argument and can't admit that because you are a weak child
who needs to cover their flaws like a child who mistakenly shat their pants.
LOL, you can't make this stuff up, this is something you have to see to believe, very sociopathic, but you have to admire that blatant straight face lying.
Let's give our resident sociopath AgentofCoin a round of applause.
There's a lot more, you just have to see to believe.
Once again, if people take the time to read that part of the discussion, Troll Buster has
taken my statements out of context. At that time, I proved Alex.BTC (the alt of Troll
Buster) that his evidence was wrong with one simple answer. He screwed up the timeline
of events and never acknowledge that aspect and moved on in the discussion. I proved it
and he couldn't man up. Meanwhile, where is the part where I provided evidence to something
that was later proven incorrect and I did not correct myself?
It seems by this current ranting, he has had a hard time dealing with our prior discussions.
Your inability to move on and your insistence to "get me" only proves that I may have valid
points worthy of contemplation, not that they are worthless. If they truly were worthless,
they are not worthy of comment. yet here you are again, rehashing old issues.