Quote from: kiklo on July 08, 2017, 04:42:24 AM

Quote from: Vod on July 07, 2017, 05:49:47 PM

Quote from: Iranus on July 07, 2017, 05:30:06 PM

I guess kiklo will be having a field day. He probably thinks that he did this with the incessant spamming.

There is no doubt about that.

Pretty immature for an 84 year old, eh?

Did you Dumb Asses ever bother looking at the reputation forum, the majority of complaints are about Lauda, I think I created about 4 or 5 topics in a 2 month period and then locked them.

The majority of complaints are about Lauda. Almost all of these complaints bring no new information.

Your complaints were all just repeating the same thing several things - that you really, really don't like Lauda, or that Lauda is being mean to you.

You are now pushing to a new way of phrasing the argument by assertion. Rational Wiki explains it like this:

Quote from: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_by_assertion

Alternately, the argument can be phrased as:
X has been asserted as true many times.
Things that have been asserted as true many times are true.
X is true.

Quote from: kiklo

There were a lot more ongoing topics about Lauda's abuse of DT, by multiple users.
Ignoring that shows you trying to hide the facts.

OK, this is true, albeit exaggerated. There were a couple of shady cases such as jonald_fyookball - I don't think he should have got negative trust on DT. While Lauda is not on DT, the negative trust is reasonable, because Lauda no longer needs to be so objective.

Quote from: kiklo

Anyone want to compare my IQ and apparent Age, read my Post History and then read the Fatman's Vod Post history , it is not hard at all to discern which of us is Older and Wiser.

Yep, you're one of the cleverest and most mature people I've ever seen Wink