Quote from: imsaguy on May 02, 2013, 03:12:17 PM

Quote from: lduck on May 02, 2013, 03:06:16 PM

my point is, AM is not asking for any new investment, so posting information every hour to make prices "fair" is not in the interest of EVERY shareholder. (as it cost men-hours) How much information get average shareholder of Google/Apple/... ?
on the other hand, I we should probably know at least few of other people that are in board and around Friedcat. Or in some other way responsible for AM decisions.

Google/Apple are required to submit financials at least quarterly and be independently audited at least yearly. Obviously people bought into AM without having the same requirements. Asking for expanded information from the few sentence 'updates' is fair. How much effort does it really take to compose a paragraph write up about what you did over the past week or two and what your plan is for the next two or four weeks? Don't even post it in English. Post it in your native language and I'll sit with the translator to parse it myself. I understand the fallacy with trying to plan too far in the future, but that doesn't mean you don't plan at all.

they made statement about planing to have average 10% till the end of year. every percent more AM will have in average for 2013 year is bonus. if someone expected more, because they mentioned they payed for mask(long time investment), and are planing to deliver 200TH/s(without mentioning when and without mentioning it was payed for it), then it is/was speculation. (-- I personally think all 200TH/s would not be online at the end of 2013, but that's just my speculation.)
so some plans are. we will see how they will end.

furuknap: they made statement that no more than 200000 shares will be sold. so there is just one real source of money for everything - mining. and it's hard to make any statement how many % they will use when BTC price is unstable.

I would like to see more information too, but I don't see why I would deserve it.