Quote from: hv_ on July 11, 2017, 03:05:37 PM

In a couple of years lot of LN fan boys will hate LN because they've lost a lot of money and will say we were not properly warnded that on-chain is by millions more safe than off-chain...

Which is an absolutely bullshit claim that is not surprising from BU/EC/Segwit2x supporters (all of which are dangerous cancer).

Quote from: ComputerGenie on July 11, 2017, 09:15:20 AM

Quote from: dinofelis on July 11, 2017, 08:53:26 AM

....

I was wrong, that's the dumbest thing I've read in 60 pages. Undecided

Dinofelis often posted garbage that is out of touch with reality, i.e. a view of Bitcoin that fits his own agenda. I have previously suspected him to be a government/agency/corporation shill (which would make sense considering he's unwanted yet persists by continually posting his nonsense).

Quote from: jbreher on July 11, 2017, 03:20:55 PM

Quote from: Lauda on July 11, 2017, 08:08:18 AM

But Roger told me Garzik has code in billions of devices Huh

True story. Every contemporary Linux install that employs ATA (maybe 95+% of all currently running Linux systems) is absolutely dependent on his code.

You didn't understand my post. Roger posted that as if it actually gave credibility for the quality of someone's Bitcoin Code. Hint: It isn't.