Quote from: Lauda on July 14, 2017, 06:53:55 PM

Quote from: jbreher on July 14, 2017, 06:48:47 PM

My mere presence here is 'participating in this community in any possible way'.

You are not participating in any possible way.

Quote from: jbreher on July 14, 2017, 06:48:47 PM

Nevertheless, as I have indicated before, I am here looking after my interests.

Interests of your employer? Got it. Your main interest (or that of your employer) is the centralization of Bitcoin and a transition from a peer-to-peer, to a proxy-to-proxy network.

Quote from: jbreher on July 14, 2017, 06:48:47 PM

OTOH, with your being paid to advance the interests of 'gunbot' with paid sig advertising, you are by definition a shill.

Which is absolutely wrong. I am not supposed to advance the interest of anyone with the current signature that I am wearing.

Quote from: jbreher on July 14, 2017, 06:48:47 PM

As to whether or not I am unwanted....

Per definition, cancer.

Quote from: jbreher on July 14, 2017, 06:48:47 PM

Bull-fucking-shit. Lie, lie, and lie again. As I responded to you the last time you propagated this lie:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1915733.msg19064080#msg19064080

The quoted parts have nothing to do with what I wrote. A clear distinction can be seen in your previous statements on non-mining nodes and the recent ones. I wonder why that is. Roll Eyes

Again - quoting fully to avoid any impropriety, and to commemorate your obtuseness, ignorance, and malfeasance:

Quote from: Lauda on July 14, 2017, 04:31:46 PM

Again, if you are *unpaid* (not that anyone would believe this after following these threads around) and you are not actively participating in this community in any possible way, and you are likely unwanted, why are you here?

Now you are being a special kind of stupid. My mere presence here is 'participating in this community in any possible way'. Nevertheless, as I have indicated before, I am here looking after my interests. 'My interests', defined herein for the purposes of this thread, consist essentially of the increased utility of Bitcoin, leading to the increased usage of Bitcoin, leading to wider adoption of Bitcoin, leading to the appreciation of my non-insignificant Bitcoin holdings. As I have held consistently.

OTOH, with your being paid to advance the interests of 'gunbot' with paid sig advertising, you are by definition a shill.

As to whether or not I am unwanted.... I guess that sucks to be you.

Quote

Strangely enough, until CW and other scammers claimed that the peer-to-peer model was worthless (proxy-to-proxy datacenters seem to be desirable), neither Jonald nor you were diminishing the value of user nodes.

Bull-fucking-shit. Lie, lie, and lie again. As I responded to you the last time you propagated this lie:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1915733.msg19064080#msg19064080

(some emphasis not in original)

OK, I guess it is true that I was not "diminishing the value of user nodes". But that is just because you are evidently incapable of Englishing. I believe the word you were looking for was 'denigrating'. Which indeed is shown by the above quoted material. In case you _still_ can't grasp elementary grammar, it is impossible to 'diminish' an entity without directly interacting with that very entity. Because, English.