Quote from: Annabelle75 on July 13, 2017, 03:17:24 PM

Decred is a fabulous project and it'd be great to mine alongside ETHASH @miningpoolhub :-)

Reading the comments on EXP, and regardless of what whattomine reports, the slight increase in hashrate isn't worth it in terms of return dollar-for-dollar Vs. ETH, ETC or even Music, not really even close. Can you adjust the algo for how you calculate profitability? About -30% would seem in the ballpark.

If you'd like a real-world test I'd be happy to concurrently point X hashrate at each for a period of time to see, we could assume the sell price each type of coins mined would be fixed @the time MPH (what is the correct acronym?) auto-switched from ETH/ETC to Expanse....

ALSO! I'd love to see PoS pooling started by MPH. Especially DASH and Decred. MPH could get to 1000 DASH pretty quickly and offer fractional shares in a supernode, and essentially offer delegated stake pools for mined Decreds/NEM/whatever else can be staked. It'd be great to double-down on (mined) coin rewards in one location!

I will check EXP.
Seems like yobit exchange site's price gathering is making some wrongly computed EXP profit.

I think PoS is next level to support. I'm still dealing with PoW realted works like statistics and email alarms. I'll consider it. Thanks.

Quote from: z0n0 on July 13, 2017, 05:54:17 PM

Pls add ZenCash.
Thanks!

Yeah I'm working on it.

Quote from: carlo_0000 on July 13, 2017, 07:12:51 PM

right i did not notice why is multi algo stuck on expense ?

we are losing a lot of bitcoins it s definitely not more profitable

Expanse was estimated to produce more coin at that time. Anyway I'll improve things to make earnings better.

Quote from: fonyo on July 13, 2017, 08:20:54 PM

Quote from: Jaerin on July 13, 2017, 05:03:04 PM

I've seen that as well with my Neoscrypt mining that the pool seems to show 0 hashrate, but the local miner is showing it mining just fine. No errors are indications of rejected hashes or anything. Must be an issue with the KlausT CCminer as that was the one I was using too.

I just rebenchmarked Tpruvot and Carsenk's update for Tribus and they are better hashrate anyways. We'll see if they work better.

For some reason klaust is doing much better on my nvidia cards.
I have another one and that's with neoscrypt:
- stratum subscribe timed out

Anyone any ideas? @miningpoolhub?

I don't have any idea about it. So I made an issue at KalusT / ccminer github repository. Maybe KalusT dev would know.

Quote from: fonyo on July 14, 2017, 10:24:44 AM

@miningpoolhub

What are your plans regarding the 1st August Bitcoin update? Will you disallow withdraws for a period of time as a safety measure? What if the Bitcoin chain splits, will you be supporting both or go with the Core or a new "classic" version of Bitcoin? Please elaborate on these and possibly make a note on top of the page of MPH as an announcement to make aware others as well (link to your response here, separate page on MPH, etc).

Thanks!

Actually I have not decided anything yet. Just monitoring how things will go especially bitcoin network and exchange sites. If exchange sites split and trade them each, I would have to split too.

Do you have any suggestion?