Quote from: LocoMB on July 16, 2017, 05:29:30 AM

Quote from: cryptohunter on July 16, 2017, 12:05:37 AM

It is the job of the ico to make sure it is not too late for too many people compared to other icos running at that time

who sets the standards? You, you, and ... you?

Quote

Meantime I await the logic you employed to render my logic regarding narrow distribution and collusion/market making illogical.

owot? ... .. {logic} .. {logic} ... making .. [illogical]

what programming language is this? must be paraquantum extended lambda calculus - can you please give us 'HELLO WORLD' code in this language?
Because if you can't you can not be regarded competent enough to utter an opinion.

Quote

I am genuinely interested because this is the crux of the entire matter.
If we no longer need to ensure wide distribution to prevent collusion and market making this is something of great interest. Whats your secret?

who is 'WE'? You and your imaginary friends again?

Free word of advice: Time to realize that these imaginary friends are not real, you won't feel any better without a change of habits

- which is exactly the advice a therapist would offer you if you could afford one, but you don't have to thank me

Blah blah blah...

Techno blabbering with more attempts at diversion...

Here let me make it simple for you so that you don't have to pull out your paraquantum extended lambda calculus calculator to continue the discussion and anyone here is free to give an opinion.

Without ensuring the initial distribution is wide then how do you avoid collusion and market making?

Without advertising widely and having and open ended ico then how do you ensure wide initial distribution?

Iota was not widely distributed because it was not widely advertised like other ico's of the time ( confirmed by small dev funds raised (16x less than others of the time), more telling the small number of shills sticking up for it and a few new sock puppets like you)) therefore i predicted days after the end of the stealth ico this fomo would be created and collusion between the few insiders would ensure ransome like demands for the tokens of 2000x ico stealth prices. Since the distribution was narrow there was nothing that could prevent this to a degree. It is still 100'sx greater than ICO.

Now that we dont need your techno babble to understand this simple concept you can get enter the discussion without your high and mighty attitude. You're the kind of person that likes to take the argument of track to your own specific area of knowledge where you can try and blather your way out of things via diversion . Sorry here you will not pull that bullshit.

I have no interest in your opinion on anything other than specifically what the thread is about.

You seem to be unable to understand simple concepts... although you would like to give them impression that you firmly grasp more complex concepts ....just start with the simple things in life then progress.

Once I see that you are able to understand the very simple but powerful point I am making then you are free to run along and make your paraquantum extended lambda calculus threads where only you and cfb are entitled or can be bothered to give opinion. Obviously you guys are the smartest on this board so that thread will have small input from the rest. Perhaps you should run an ico in there and give the details of how to invest in this code you both are able to decipher then since you are probably both part of the same entity the market making will be even easier than with iota and you can count on 1000000x ico prices after building enough nxt3 fomo. I mean so long as both of your personalities can agree on the launch price and keep to it then it's basically a guaranteed self enrichment scheme... like iota but with an even more narrow distribution.