Quote from: hv_ on July 17, 2017, 09:12:22 AM

Quote from: Lauda on July 17, 2017, 09:09:42 AM

Quote from: hv_ on July 17, 2017, 09:07:51 AM

No - other 'forks' have lower quality and less to disagree..

Both Bitcoin forks and forks of this forum (e.g. Bitcoin.com) are much worse than the original, indeed. Status quo wins in pretty much any aspect (besides a few policies that I do not agree with, I guess).

Hahaha - at least we agree that it needs a central forum to agree centrally about decentralization needs.

Pretty much, yeah. However, certain shills will cry about censorship et. al. if the majority of the users do not side with their (obviously faulty) views. Tongue

Quote from: franky1 on July 17, 2017, 09:17:02 AM

Quote from: Lauda on July 16, 2017, 09:00:52 AM

Answer this clearly (don't write useless walls of text). Do you, or do you not agree with $20k as the entry cost for a node (as mentioned by C. scammer Wright)?

this early in the industry no,
in a couple decades, probably.. but more so due to hyper inflation where $20k may be equivalent to $500 purchase power today(EG a loaf of bread being $80, standard pc $20k in a couple decades)

There you have it. As long as you do not support scammers who are trying to push an idea of $20k nodes today (this includes anyone who supports C. Wright, e.g. Ver, Jihan), you are not as bad as the shills like Jonald.

Quote from: franky1 on July 17, 2017, 09:17:02 AM

as for you debunking anything, no

Grow up and admit being wrong, idiot. The number of times that you've been debunked is converging to infinity. Do I have to remind you of your FUD with the sigops limit in recent versions of Bitcoin Core? Roll Eyes