Quote from: jbreher on July 17, 2017, 05:13:12 PM

What 'pattern', exactly, are you referring to?

Good question.

Quote from: jbreher on July 17, 2017, 05:13:12 PM

Further, your proofless slanderous attacks only reduce your credibility even further. Even your (former) acolytes have to be WTF-ing by now. You, Lauda, are an insignificant gnat.

Whining does not help when things are obvious even to the average reader. Of course, when some other users mention your unwanted shilling you use ad hominem against them (e.g. Darkbot) or call them a X/Y/Z shill.

Quote from: jbreher on July 17, 2017, 05:13:12 PM

As much money as it takes to not choke off usage.

Vague statement; not surprising. Any increase in cost will choke off a part of the usage, thus you do not support any increase in costs?

Quote from: franky1 on July 17, 2017, 05:25:45 PM

8-10mb is safe so anything below that is super safe. and borderline anal safe. there is no reason to stick with 1mb base.

Which is an absolute lie and has nothing to do with reality. 10 MB isn't even remotely safe. You're pulling numbers out of your behind. I am not generally against a well planned hard fork, but comparing Segwit to a rushed block size increase is nonsensical. The latter is useless in comparison.

The number of people arguing nonsense such as yourself is very low. The number of people with any relevant contributions arguing these positions on bitcointalk: 0.