Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on July 19, 2017, 04:08:18 PM

Quote from: habraken on July 19, 2017, 03:58:10 PM

Go code. As we've established, you've shown no proficiency at anything else.
Or go answer some of those support emails you'll find on the first pages of this thread. Or maybe go find yourself a better lawyer just in case.

I'm coding while replying to you

No, if you were actually replying to me, there would have been no need for me to post about IOTA reeking like a scam anymore, and I would have stopped. It's simple logic. But you already admitted in this thread you're not serious about replying or even fully reading posts by people you have cowardly declared trolls, because their posts are too critical of IOTA. So just like David, you are full of shit and arrogance (power corrupts, as I said). Which no doubt rubs off on the company you two are supposedly running (possibly into the ground if you go on like this). Have you found a better lawyer yet? You seem to have the time to post nonsense on this silly forum, but you have no time to respond to your investors' emails. Maybe that could be called 'negligence'.

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on July 19, 2017, 05:22:44 PM

Quote from: habraken on July 19, 2017, 05:12:29 PM

I'd say you'd be behaving like one, but that would be an insult to little girls all over the world.

See, with every new post you just prove that you are a troll. Surprised you get what you deserve? Cheesy

No, I only troll IOTA representatives that are clearly trolls. That's how the world works.
Why don't you go answer support tickets from people that were foolish enough to trust IOTA to be a serious company?

Quote from: websioux on July 19, 2017, 02:57:10 PM

KYC and then what ? naked pic ? suck dick ? Angry

I'm not anonymous and I'm not happy with Jean Luc posting on 9th while he should have done at earliest on 12th at decent time, if he wanted to. I can not understand that at all. But your personal affairs are not my business, and my business is already harmed a lot by the lack of equal treatment that I'm victim of due to your inaccurate instructions given.

So NOW it is time to stop playing games and RESPECT your part of the contact.

KYC is not part of the deal, when someone change a deal, we all know what it means.

1. Damage occurs NOW, so Cfb arguments are not strong enough to justify a change of deal.

2. Protection of anonymity is a human right, only absolute force majeur might justify me to go against such conviction, this is clearly not. I believe more than one will think the same.

Enforced KYC will then be perceived by me and by others as unjustified, opportunistic use of force, other than for some personal satisfaction, to violate respectable convictions and increase damage made to participant(s) whose treatment had already failed to be treated fairly.

So is it still an option ?

If Yes, I advise you take advise.

Quoted for truth.

Quote from: Jean-Luc on July 09, 2017, 11:06:48 PM

This thread has now collected evidence and documented the experience of several IOTA purchasers whose manual claims have been ignored for almost one year now. We have seen that contrary to the statements by the IOTA team that it is the users' fault for leaving the claim till the last moment, most such users have been trying to claim multiple times since last year, never to receive a response. Others, whose claims may have formally been processed, still can't get hold of their IOTA because the software now doesn't let them access the same addresses. A few users I have talked to privately prefer not to post their case in public, so the number of submitted but ignored claims is actually higher.

Several of the claimants I have been in talks with are more than willing to consider taking legal action (and unlike me, do not care to remain anonymous). The IOTA team is no longer unaccountable. Unlike the common scams here, they do have a business presence in the real world and have even managed to attract traditional VC investors. So I would be curious to find out how would Jamie Burke and his partners from Outlier Ventures feel about having their investment in IOTA spent on fending off lawsuits, settling legal claims, and fixing bad PR, instead of on technical and business development? Will they like the fact that the names of Outlier Ventures and IOTA now appear together in the context of scam accusations and lawsuit threats? I plan to ask them. In fact, it may be a good idea for all of you with outstanding manual claims to also copy them, in one last claim request. Their contact info is conveniently posted at https://outlierventures.io/#contact and they proudly (for now) list IOTA as a startup they have invested in. And unlike David, who may just say he never got your request, those guys are used to being accountable and wouldn't take the risk of ignoring you.

Just a friendly reminder.