Quote from: xf2_org on June 11, 2011, 06:49:14 PM

Quote from: Stevie1024 on June 11, 2011, 06:13:05 PM

Quote from: xf2_org on June 11, 2011, 06:03:54 PM

Quote from: Stevie1024 on June 11, 2011, 05:52:47 PM

Quote from: benjamindees on June 10, 2011, 11:54:14 PM

I wouldn't call bullshit so quickly. I have some suspicions that there are a couple of major problems lurking.

Anyone interested in some of these, please have a look at: http://www.newbitcoin.org/documents/newbitcoin.pdf

This paper is filled with inaccurate observations and assumptions.

Please name one, or, if you have the time, some. I'm very happy to learn and if I'm wrong I will happily admit so.

The transaction fee has already been lowered.

I'm not sure what "inaccurate observation or assumption" in my paper you are referring to. I stated that the enforced limits (like indeed transaction fee) are not optimal ones. And that I think that they should definitly not be under control of a small group of developers.

The fact that after publication of my paper the fee has already been lowered seems to support my statement.

EDIT

Since yesterday I have effectivly been labeled a troll (having 'only' 22 posts) and prohited any chance to respond to reply to xf2_org's last mail. This is appearently how the Bitcoin community wants to deal with valid critique.

I'm not going to risk this happening again. If you think my critique is valid, I'm inviting you to join me on:

http://bitcoinforum.org/

I promise you that critique, valid or not, will never be censored.