Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable PoS Smart Contract Platform - TestNet Live!
by
ethlover1234
on 21/07/2017, 14:25:48 UTC
QTUM  founded by a conman. He founded Bitbay and left with all the ICO funds. Then used Bitbays ICO funds to create QTUM and then buy their own ICO.

Do your research on the founder Steven/Patrick

This is not trolling its the truth


It's funny how people who are overly critical of Dai all seem to define research and truth on this forum. They take the word of David Zimbeck as truth, and the hitpiece of a Coinjournal article which goes as far as to attack Caspal's Rubik's cube record, WRONGLY saying that Caspal does not hold any.

Here are the narratives I've seen so far with the conspiracy-prone skeptics: 1) Qtum is scam. They will take your ICO money --->  2) Okay, they haven't left project and taken ICO money but they will! ---> 3) They have probably already stolen the ICO money! We don't have txids (incomes third-party accounting firm that shuts these guys the fuck up).  ---> 4) They're just a pump a dump (for some reason, they continue to develop the project though...)



Here's a more neutral article for those who actually care about that stuff:
https://www.smithandcrown.com/qtum-controversy-patrick-dais-exit-bitbay/

To some people integrity actually means something. The fact that he won't scam QTUM doesn't change his actions in the past. And to be honest, for me this was enough reason not to invest.

I respect your decision not to invest, and I think it's a completely valid reason. With that being said, if integrity were the main issue with many of the people shouting scam, then they wouldn't post things like, "He founded Bitbay and left with all the ICO funds. Then used Bitbays ICO funds to create QTUM and then buy their own ICO... This is not trolling its the truth," when that's not true at all.

Somewhat comically, the implication of what was said here is that Dai would exit with the Qtum ICO funds. If that were the case, he would've left a long time ago.