Quote from: jbreher on July 24, 2017, 06:42:30 AM

Quote from: fluidjax on July 24, 2017, 06:30:47 AM

Quote from: jbreher on July 24, 2017, 06:08:41 AM

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on July 24, 2017, 12:40:46 AM

Quote from: jbreher on July 24, 2017, 12:29:05 AM

Quote from: bitserve on July 23, 2017, 10:14:07 PM

Roger Ver, who owns ViaBTC

Got any evidence to go with that assertion?

Quote

Bitcoin Cash is NOT a HF of Bitcoin.

By any sane definition, Bitcoin Cash is exactly a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain.

Here to pump an altcoin bear? ... things must be getting pretty sad in the anti-core camp?

Just clarifying for the sake of truth. Depending upon the sequencing of things, Bitcoin Cash may be no more altcoin than is SegWit coin (which is somewhat playfully starting to be referred to as Bitcoin-Jr)

Stop messing about with the semantics, clearly people are using slightly differing definitions of words here, ignoring that definition and then fighting about what it implies is meaningless.

I can create a hard fork of Bitcoin in a few minutes (tweak some params, change difficultly for that tweak, recompile , mine a block, and we have a hard fork).. it means nothing. The level of support and consensus is what is important.

I can certainly agree with the bolded sentence. And we don't know the level of support and consensus until the experiment is run. Fact is, in roughly coterminous timeframes, all Bitcoiners will be forced to choose between: Change A to Bitcoin; or Change B to Bitcoin. No option for Unchanged Bitcoin. So get off your high horse. If one is an alt before the fact, then so is the other.

Cheers!

AFAIK LTC was such a HF ?