Quote from: nemgun on July 28, 2017, 09:47:54 AM

Quote from: fordlincoln1 on July 28, 2017, 01:17:08 AM

I've met the Enjin team and talked to them, I was super impressed with their experience working on Enjin for the last 9 years and the amount of users on their platform. This project is credible and I'm looking forward to the ICO.

Quote from: dz4505 on July 28, 2017, 01:46:32 AM

I'll be honest, scam accusation aside, which been kind of baseless, they have a working platform for years. This is more than a lot of the other ICOs has and they have potential customers they can already tap into.

The thing is that no one replies to my questions, yes there are users who pays FIATS to Enjin, however they loosed 50% of their frequentation volume, i can't imagine that someone will buy Eth and Enjin coin to use it on the platform as it is more complicated for non crypto users.
Knowing the team doesn't makes them trustfull. I know alex from CPS too, and he told me that they can be trusted, however when i looked deeply into the project i understood they are unexperimented. Ask yourself something, as they know alex, why haven't they mentioned him as an advisor ?
The Ethereum tokens are built on a decentralized network, Enjin wants to centralize the token, which is a roll back as the project is centralized they have nothing to do with cryptos, they can create their own virtual token and use it into their platform, but it wouldn't have the same impact and wouldn't bring the same traction.

Does it really matter if a project is centralize (Ripple) or decentralize. If the project can make me money, I'm all for it. Rather have a centralized platform that gives ROI than a failed decentralized platform that loses money.

If Facebook decides to use their centralized platform and introduce a decentralized token to it I am all for it.