Quote from: migello on August 02, 2017, 09:32:28 AM

Quote from: 888cj on August 02, 2017, 08:27:47 AM

vested in NVO largely to support the building out of the SafeNetwork. I have lost confidence in the NVO team. The communication from the NVO team I've seen on the Safe Forum (see link below) was unprofessional at best and disturbing at worst.
https://safenetforum.org/t/nvo-decentralized-exchange-crowdsale/13608/969

If refunds are available I would like to opt out of the NVO project.

a project launched 1 month ago and they are hiring a team, offered help, devs, maybe money and someone is complaining? read between

the FUD, you can question the words, lack of professionalism and arrogance, but i don't see the SAFE will to help.

are we kidding?

if you are a REAL NVO investor and supporter maybe you could be ashamed by nemgun but ANGRY by the SAFE answers...

just tell NVO what you lack and what they can do to help you and the project, then agree to help with what they need if

you are fine.

if you don't believe in the project, people ecc (hey they can hire who they want with $7 mill) just tell them no.

you have invested in NVO to support SAFE? why haven't you bought Maidsafecoins instead?

in the whitepaper is stated that SAFE might not be used. have you read?

Thank you migello for your support and assistance, at the moment we only had 3 requests for refund, one who had personnal issues and therefore asked to be refunded, the second was worried about the Chinese laws and the recent events, and the third one wanted to take advantage of the split to claim BCH.

They want to pollute the thread on bitcointalk, these little trolls, just because they have a problem with the money, some have been annoyed by the 8 millions collected during the crowdsale. They just want to try to force investors to ask for refunds, but it doesn't work, there was a dump issue on counterpart due to the split.

You can check the counterpart DEX, the volume is pretty well, and the price goes up. If you notice, most of these links points towards the moments when I get down with the insults, I asked for documents and I've been asked to dig, I have endured many things.

In their mind, maidsafe is so immense that there cannot be an architecture, so it is necessary to make podcasts and several whitepapers while everything must have a global architecture, even if it is a simple "ULM" architecture.

For them there are so many buildings that can not be summarized on a simple architecture, whereas in this case it is necessary to make an architecture in order to be able to keep track of the functionalities of each building.

They told me to go on their github and that from there, I could see the structure, and yet even their github lack organization. They have switched from safe_launcher to safe_browser, but the safe_launcher repo is still there while they have an archieving account.