Quote from: RB25 on August 05, 2017, 05:54:05 PM

Quote from: digitaldoxy on August 05, 2017, 04:53:16 PM

Quote from: RB25 on August 03, 2017, 03:37:04 PM

There probably won't be a whole lot of news from Digibyte until the Citi Competition announcements. There have been some ominous posts, though, about rebranding and such. Makes me think something is coming and they made a contact or two during their presentation weekend.

Also, remember, they probably signed non-disclosure agreements for the competition. So, even if they have something, they won't be able to legally disclose it to anyone, lest they be disqualified.

Hand tight and be patient.

"ominous" is the perfect way to describe the posts.... And I don't think it's an omen of anything good unfortunately... Here is the link to the post for anyone who's interested....

https://www.reddit.com/r/Digibyte/comments/21fa73/should_we_rebrand_digibyte/

Digibyte dev team and Jared seem to have lost all direction, and are hoping the community can solve the issue for them. Problem is, when people give them the sobering advice they really need to hear, they go quiet for a while, then release another poll or forum question suggesting some other half baked idea... If Jared was even slightly serious about any of these idea's why didn't he purchase Digibyte.org (for the fictional DGB foundation) for the measly 300 bucks it was selling for on Sedo until recently :/

One minute there's talk about starting up a foundation, the next, it's a re-branding... What next?.... I get a mental image of a bunch of devs running around the DGB office with blind folds on yelling warmer, colder, warmer, colder at each other hoping one of them runs into a non-existent roadmap for DGB's future. It seems to be the season for forking, and IMO maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing for the community should it happen to DGB, if its custodians can't get themselves together, and take charge of DGB's future.

Holy post back from the dead!! Are you really pulling a 3 year old post out now to try to FUD DGB? Of course they needed direction 3 years ago, everyone did. Everyone was scrambling to make the next BTC. Now, 3 years on, much has changed.

I'll gladly cop that on the chin, was on my phone at 3 in the morning and didn't check the date (lack of sleep and stupidity on my part)... Could you refer me to the "ominous post about rebranding" that was being referred to then? As it would seem my post is no less valid if there's another rebranding exercise on the horizon... I'll be happy to withdraw my "fud" if I'm chomping on the wrong end of the stick though.