Quote from: nrigo on August 05, 2017, 08:09:37 PM

Quote from: Bittzy78 on August 05, 2017, 04:22:57 PM

Quote from: pagona on August 05, 2017, 12:05:46 PM

ok, we have a good start here Grin

It is a good start but once again some observations.

The ANN - No control means unable to update with current information.

Roadmap/Purpose - There is no updated/Current roadmap.

Slack - Most crypto people look for an active Slack as a minimum before investing in a coin.

Active/Responsive Dev team - People want to see that the coin team is dedicated and will be around long term.

Website - People like to see an up to date website.

If there is a R/S before these things are sorted you will not see a carryover of value to the new, smaller money supply coin.

Again, just food for thought.

Quote from: rockmoney on July 30, 2017, 01:52:34 AM

A good start to ensuring it has a fighting chance would be to update all of the info in the OP. Almost all of the links in the OP are broken/down/not working, there is a general lack of updated information from both dev plans & future road-map, there are threads everywhere & nothing seems organized, & there have been no software updates (which is primarily what makes me so skeptical). Many of these problems are very simple fixes which would definitely be a step in the right direction, and likely bring more people on-board (organizing all of the threads & their layouts, fixing links, making relevant & related information easily accessible, etc.).

I totally agree with you and with rockmoney who posted this ^ a few days ago.

Honestly, the only way to really distance yourselves from the current state of a affairs that Coin2 is in now would be a rebranding of Coin2. It makes it easier that say that "Triton Tokens" (I just picked a generic name) no longer has anything to do with the old and busted "Coin2."

It isn't knock to the legacy of Coin2 but more a necessity due to the extreme confusion that is Coin2 right now.