Quote from: Vycid on May 08, 2013, 12:04:41 AM

Quote from: twelph on May 07, 2013, 11:55:01 PM

Quote from: Vycid on May 07, 2013, 11:52:18 PM

Quote from: twelph on May 07, 2013, 11:48:45 PM

Quote from: Vycid on May 07, 2013, 11:44:44 PM

Quote from: twelph on May 07, 2013, 11:41:24 PM

Bitbar fills the gap of combining great ideas, MC2 will innovate.

Oh yes, 520 confirms to maturity is pure brilliance. Such innovation. They even used the word "bar" in the name instead of "coin". I can barely keep up with all the changes.

Move over, Satoshi!

You forgot the inclusion of scrypt and POS. And besides, I didn't say that Bitbar innovates, try reading the things that you quote.

Alright then. Bitbar combined the great ideas of NVC with... the name "Bitbar".

Hey, wanna buy my Bitbar? I'll give you 1:1.

More like combining Novacoin with Mincoin.

I could call Novacoin a good idea without bursting out laughing... its problem was the premine (something Bitbar faithfully copied). Mincoin, however, was and is a terrible idea. There's a reason FTC and CNC exploded and it didn't (and I'm still not even saying FTC/CNC are good coins).

While the mainstream is discussing using mBTC as the de facto currency unit, we've got knuckleheads over here making a premined coin with a block reward of 2. Notice LTC (the successful altcoin) is more plentiful than BTC, FTC even more so.

If you ask me, PPCoin is the only honest coin with a truly good idea behind it at the moment (besides NMC, which is merge-mined).

Yep, PPCoin was definitely innovative. Was Bitbar pre-mined or instamined? I know whichever one it is, a lot of those coins are now a bounty for an exchange. So at least they are trying. Only time will tell if a store of wealth is useful vs being able to easily spend them.